More Is More, Less Is Less…
The truth is more is more, and less is less. Less is not really more. Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe’s famous phrase should be interpreted on a relative basis. Something can only be ‘less‘ in comparison to something ‘more‘. But something cannot exist just being ‘less’ all by itself, just the same way something can’t just be ‘more’! Something has to be ‘more than’ or ‘less than’ another thing. It’s not only relative, it’s also subjective. Some will say a house is not the same thing as a home and that a home is more that a house. You can have the most aesthetically beautiful, minimalist moderniost house imaginable which is architecturally ‘less’ than a traditional house with an arched roof and front lawn etc, with messy interiors and toys and books and stuff all over the place. But someone could argue that as beautiful as that other house is, it’s not a home and in that sense is less than the example I just gave. In a situation like that, is less really more. Let’s take it up a notch and consider the idea of communicating more with less. This is what all good designers and graphic designers should aim for, the ability to make me think a similar thing to what you wanted me to think, using as few elements as necessary. For example, if I design a logo and it doesn’t communicate anything to me, then that logo has failed me. If I strip it down and it doesn’t communicate what I want it to, but then I add more to it and then it begins to convey my idea, that in this instance more is more suitable than less. But if when it’s minimal and it communicates nothing and when it’s maximal it communicates nothing, then more is equal to less. So in summary, less is not more, less is less and more is more. If ‘less’ isn’t a more effective communicator of a concept than ‘more’, then less is equal to more, and the two cancel each other out. But if ‘less’ isn’t working and adding more works, then comparitively and in that situation, more is equal than that specific ‘less’. Get it?

